91porn

This online version is for convenience; the official version of this policy is housed in the University Secretariat. In case of discrepancy between the online version and the official version held by the Secretariat, the official version shall prevail.

Approving Authority: Vice President: Advancement & External Relations

Original Approval Date: October 11, 2024

Date of Most Recent Review/Revision: N/A

Administrative Responsibility: Office of Advancement

Parent Policy: 13.5 Naming of University Assets

1.0 General

These procedures provide direction and protocol for 91porn staff when negotiating, setting up, or reviewing naming assets at the University. These procedures ensure that 91porn is consistent with philanthropic and honorific namings from the past, in the present and in future, and will be reviewed every 5 years to ensure their relevance and proper application.

1.1 The decision to accept, decline or revoke the naming of a University asset will rest with the Development Committee and the Board of Governors, except as may be delegated by the Board of Governors to the President & Vice-Chancellor or Vice-President: Advancement & External Relations.

1.2 Naming recommendations, including any values determined, will be led by the Office of Advancement, and based on appropriate due diligence, including but not limited to conducting research, vetting social media, consultation with subject matter experts and those impacted where appropriate, as well as the standards for each level of naming opportunity or particular asset as determined from time to time by the University.

1.3 In determining values, the size, location, and profile of the asset will be considered along with the industry’s best practices and existing precedent. For values that exceed $5 million (CDN), are precedent setting or involve sensitive issues, the Office of Advancement will facilitate their review and approval by the Board of Governors on the recommendation of the Development Committee. 

1.3.1 When determining the value to name an asset, ongoing operating and/or maintenance needs and expenses should be considered during the expected life of the asset.

1.4 In cases when a decision to name an asset requires approval by the Development Committee and/or Board of Governors, the following information should be provided:

1.4.1 A statement as to the nature and impact of the gift meriting named recognition.

1.4.2 A description of the asset being named.

1.4.3 A statement of the naming’s relevance, sustainability, and impact on the University’s strategic priorities when relevant.

1.4.4 A statement summarizing any risks associated with the naming, particularly as it relates to the reputation of the University.

1.4.5 The term of the naming.

1.4.6 A provision dealing with the contingency that the gift is not received in accordance with the gift agreement.

1.5 When an asset is named by an individual donor or by a family foundation, the default naming term is for the life of the asset as per its original state and/or purpose when named unless otherwise stipulated in a gift or naming agreement between the University and the donor.

1.6 When an asset is named by a corporation or corporate foundation, the default naming term is a maximum of 10 years unless otherwise stipulated in a gift or naming agreement between the University and the donor. If a sizable portion of the gift is endowed, then the University may, at its discretion, offer corporations and corporate foundations with the opportunity to name in perpetuity.

1.7 Namings in recognition of a corporate gift or as negotiated as part of a corporate sponsorship are permitted, however they should be reviewed with additional care.

1.7.1 To avoid the appearance of commercial influence or conflict of interest, the University will conduct additional due diligence. An assessment of the corporate history, business practices, reputation, long-term trajectory, and any other factor appropriate to considering a long-term naming will be done.

1.7.2 Usually, namings that involve corporation gifts or sponsorships shall be limited to 10 years, and shall not involve the naming of a Faculty, Department, or academic building.

1.7.3 The size, design, and wording of plaques or other signs acknowledging corporate gifts should comply with 91porn naming and recognition signage standards. They should also avoid creating any appearance of advertising and be appropriately tailored to the nature of the facilities or properties being considered.  The size, design, and wording of signs acknowledging corporate sponsorship can incorporate limited elements of their corporate brand, relative to the nature of the properties or asset(s) being sponsored and University brand standards. 

1.8 Any naming value for assets older than 10 years, and not scheduled for any significant updates or improvements, can be increased, or decreased depending on the status and state of the asset.

1.9 Naming of assets in recognition of a bequest to the University will not be confirmed until the bequest is received by the University.

1.10 On occasion, and depending on the circumstances, an exception to these practices and procedures may be required (motivated by the donor, the space, etc.) When that is the case, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will review the needs for an exception with the Prospect Manager, Facilities & Asset Management, relevant campus partners, and the VP: Advancement & External Relations. The decision to grant an exception the decision rests with the VP: Advancement & External Relations, but they may, in their discretion, consult with the Board.

2.0 Philanthropic Naming of University Assets

The following procedures provide direction and protocol for 91porn staff when negotiating and establishing philanthropic naming and donor recognition opportunities at the University. This includes, but is not limited to, namings and associated donor recognition of schools/faculties, institutes, centres, positions, buildings, spaces, endowments, and student award opportunities.

Gift levels required for namings will be determined by many factors including, but not limited to the perceived value of naming, its prominence and location, size of campaign, campus locations, etc.

If there has been an unforeseen change in circumstances which make it difficult to fulfill the purpose of the donation or impact the status of the naming, 91porn may seek to amend the naming terms in such a manner as it deems deemed fit, considering the general intent and spirit of the original gift. The University will make every reasonable attempt to consult with the donor, their heirs, or designated successors, should amendments of naming terms be necessary.

2.1 Faculties/Schools

2.1.1 The recommended value for naming a faculty or school is $20 million (CDN).

2.1.2 Opportunities to name a school or faculty will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the School/Faculty.

2.1.3 The Prospect Manager assigned to the prospective donor will prepare a briefing note in consultation with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Dean of the associated School/Faculty before reviewing with the VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval to proceed.

2.1.4 The VP: Advancement & External Relations, will secure approval from the VP: Academic and President & Vice-Chancellor before bringing the proposed name forward to the Development Committee of the Board of Governors for review and recommendation. Following recommendations by the Development Committee, the name will proceed to the Board of Governors for approval.

2.1.5 The Prospect Manager will initiate a gift and/or naming agreement for the donor only when in receipt of an approved briefing note. The briefing note will then be stored with the complete gift and/or naming agreement in the donor’s file as documented confirmed approval of the naming.

2.2 Academic/Research Institutes

2.2.1 The recommended value for naming an academic or research institute is $10 million (CDN).

2.2.2 Opportunities to name an academic institute will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the associated Faculty.

2.2.3 The Prospect Manager assigned to the prospective donor will prepare a briefing note in consultation with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Dean of the associated faculty/department before reviewing with the VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval to proceed.

2.2.4 The VP: Advancement & External Relations will secure approval from the VP: Academic and President & Vice-Chancellor before bringing the naming forward to the Development Committee of the Board of Governors for review and approval. Following approval by the Development Committee, the naming will proceed to the Board of Governors.

2.2.5 The Prospect Manager will initiate a gift and/or naming agreement for the donor only when in receipt of an approved briefing note. The briefing note will then be stored with the complete gift and/or naming agreement in the donor’s file as documented confirmed approval of the naming.

2.3 Academic/Research Centres

2.3.1 The recommended value for naming an academic or research centre is $1 million (CDN).

2.3.2 Opportunities to name an academic centre will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the associated Faculty.

2.3.3 The Prospect Manager assigned to the prospective donor will prepare a briefing note in consultation with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Dean of the associated faculty before reviewing with the VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval to proceed.

2.3.4 The VP: Advancement & External Relations will secure approval from the VP: Academic and President & Vice-Chancellor before bringing the naming forward to the Development Committee of the Board of Governors for review and approval. Following approval by the Development Committee, the naming will proceed to the Board of Governors.

2.3.5 The Prospect Manager will initiate a gift and/or naming agreement for the donor only when in receipt of an approved briefing note. The briefing note will then be stored with the complete gift and/or naming agreement in the donor’s file as documented confirmed approval of the naming.

2.4 Academic Initiative/Project

2.4.1 The recommended value for naming an academic initiative or project is $500,000.

2.4.2 Opportunities to name an initiative or project will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the associated Faculty/Department.

2.4.3 The Prospect Manager assigned to the prospective donor will consult with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Head/Lead of the initiative or project before reviewing with the Dean of the associated faculty and VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval to proceed.

2.4.4 The VP: Advancement & External Relations will bring forward any recommendations to name an academic initiative or project to the VP: Academic and President & Vice-Chancellor for review and approval.

2.4.5 The Prospect Manager will initiate a gift and/or naming agreement for the donor only when in receipt of written approval from the VP: Advancement & External Relations. The approval will then be stored with the complete gift and/or naming agreement in the donor’s file as documented confirmed approval of the naming.

2.5 Academic Chair

2.5.1 The recommended value for naming an academic chair is $3 million to $5 million endowed or $150,000 to $200,000 annually (CDN).

2.5.2 Amounts can be offset by additional contributions committed by the faculty as negotiated by the faculty and the Prospect Manager.

2.5.3 For endowed Chairs, the endowment when fully funded should be such that it can be reasonably expected to fund the full salary and benefits of the holder of the chair based on the salary of full professors in the top quartile of the unit in which the endowment is to be held. The endowment should also be able to cover the anticipated increments to the holder of the chair’s salary based on agreements in place at the time the endowment is established.

2.5.4 For expendable Chairs, the expendable funds should be such that it can be reasonably expected to fund the full salary and benefits of the holder of the chair based on the salary of full professors in the top quartile of the unit in which the funds are to be held over the course of the term of the gift (ie. pledge period). The funds should also be able to cover the anticipated increments to the holder of the chair’s salary based on agreements in place at the time of the gift.

2.5.5 Opportunities to name a Chair will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the associated Faculty/Department.

2.5.6 The Prospect Manager assigned to the prospective donor will prepare a briefing note in consultation with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Dean of the associated School/Faculty before reviewing with the VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval to proceed.

2.5.7 The VP: Advancement & External Relations, will secure approval from the VP: Academic and President & Vice-Chancellor before bringing the naming forward to the Development Committee of the Board of Governors for review and approval. Following approval by the Development Committee, the naming will proceed to the Board of Governors.

2.5.8 The Prospect Manager will initiate a gift and/or naming agreement for the donor only when in receipt of an approved briefing note. The briefing note will then be stored with the complete gift and/or naming agreement in the donor’s file as documented confirmed approval of the naming.

2.6 Academic Professorships

2.6.1 The recommended value for naming of an academic professorship is $1.5 million to $2 million endowed or $70,000 to $80,000 annually (CDN).

2.6.2 Amounts can be offset by additional contributions committed by the faculty as negotiated by the faculty and the Prospect Manager.

2.6.3 For endowed professorships, the Endowment when fully funded should be such that it can be reasonably expected to fund at least one half of the salary and benefits of the holder of the professorship based on the salary of full professors in the top quartile of the unit in which the Endowment is to be held. The Endowment should also be able to cover the anticipated increments to the holder of the professorship’s salary based on agreements in place at the time the Endowment is established.

2.6.4 For expendable professorships, the expendable funds should be such that it can be reasonably expected to fund at least one half of the salary and benefits of the holder of the professorship based on the salary of full professors in the top quartile of the unit in which the funds are to be held over the course of the term of the gift (ie. pledge period). The funds should also be able to cover the anticipated increments to the holder of the chair’s salary based on agreements in place at the time the gift is made.

2.6.5 Opportunities to name a professorship will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the associated Faculty/Department.

2.6.6 The Prospect Manager assigned to the prospective donor will prepare a briefing note in consultation with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Dean of the associated School/Faculty before reviewing with the VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval to proceed.

2.6.7 The VP: Advancement & External Relations, will secure approval from the VP: Academic and President & Vice-Chancellor before bringing the naming forward to the Development Committee of the Board of Governors for review and approval. Following approval by the Development Committee, the naming will proceed to the Board of Governors.

2.6.8 The Prospect Manager will initiate a gift and/or naming agreement for the donor only when in receipt of an approved briefing note. The briefing note will then be stored with the complete gift and/or naming agreement in the donor’s file as documented confirmed approval of the naming.

2.7 Academic Fellowship

The term “Fellowship” is used at the discretion of the Chair of the academic department and implies annual financial support to a faculty member or graduate student at a level less than that required for a Professorship (i.e., less than one half of the full salary and benefits of the faculty member).

2.7.1 The recommended value for naming an academic fellowship is $250,000 endowed or $50,000 annually (CDN).

2.7.2 Amounts can be offset by additional contributions committed by the faculty as negotiated by the faculty and the Prospect Manager.

2.7.3 Opportunities to name a fellowship will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the associated Faculty/Department.

2.7.4 The Prospect Manager assigned to the prospective donor will consult with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Faculty Department Head before reviewing with the Dean of the associated faculty and VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval to proceed.

2.7.5 The VP: Advancement & External Relations will bring forward any recommendations to name an academic fellowship to the VP: Academic and President & Vice-Chancellor for review and approval.

2.7.6 The Prospect Manager will initiate a gift and/or naming agreement for the donor only when in receipt of written approval from the VP: Advancement & External Relations. The approval will then be recorded with the complete gift and/or naming agreement in the donor’s file as documented confirmed approval of the naming.

2.8 Physical Space/Asset

2.8.1 Recommended Value (CDN):

2.8.1.1 The recommended value for naming a building is $5 million (renovated) or $10 million (new).

2.8.1.2 The recommended value for naming a space or room is $25,000.

2.8.1.3 The recommended value for naming of an asset (bench, piano, seat, etc.) is $1,000.

2.8.2 Opportunities to name a physical space or asset will be identified and valued by Advancement in partnership with the associated Faculty/Department.

2.8.3 In the case of naming opportunities aligned with capital projects, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will bring forward recommendations to the AVP: Advancement and VP: Advancement & External Relations for review and approval including a proposed budget for signage. This involves collaboration with campus partners as required and includes identifying the space or asset proposed for naming along with naming value and a brief description when this is not inherently apparent in the name of the spaces/assets.

2.8.4 In individual cases initiated by a prospective donor via their Prospect Manager, they will consult with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR), AVP: Advancement, and Dean/Director of the associated faculty/department before reviewing with the VP: Advancement & External Relations for approval.

2.8.5 For naming recommendations that exceed $5 million in value, are precedent setting or involve sensitive issues, the VP: Advancement & External Relations is required to recommend its review and approval by the Board of Governors on the recommendation of the Development Committee. The Prospect Manager is then responsible for preparing a formal briefing note in accordance with Board procedures.

2.8.6 Once naming opportunities are approved by the VP: Advancement & External Relations, and/or Board of Governors for naming values that exceed $5 million, the opportunities will be added to the University’s central naming inventory as managed by the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations and become available for naming by benefactors and honorees.

2.8.7 Additional one-off naming opportunities will be reviewed by the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations, AVP: Advancement and VP: Advancement & External Relations as required. In unique cases, it may be necessary for the naming values to take into consideration the ongoing maintenance of a space or asset. The approvals required will be determined on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the procedures as defined in this document.

2.9 Student Scholarships/Awards/Bursaries

2.9.1 The recommended value for naming a scholarship, award or bursary is $25,000 endowed or $5,000 expendable ($1,000/year x 5 years) (CDN).

2.9.2 Opportunities to establish and name a financial aid opportunity (scholarships, awards, or bursaries) are identified and defined by the Prospect Manager, Advancement Financial Services and Compliance in partnership with the Office of Student Awards and appropriate faculties and departments.

2.9.3 The financial aid opportunity type and eligibility criteria are defined by the donors’ primary intention combined with reasonable eligibility criteria that are compliant with the Human Rights Code or other applicable legislation.

2.9.4 For new opportunities that are precedent-setting or involve sensitive issues, it is recommended that the Prospect Manager bring forward recommendations to establish and name a financial aid opportunity to the AVP: Advancement for review and approval. A gift agreement defining the opportunity will be prepared for signature as outlined in 13.6 Gift Acceptance policy.

3.0 Honorific Naming of University Assets

This section provides direction and protocol for 91porn staff when naming a University asset in honour of a meritorious person who has demonstrated leadership or made other outstanding contribution to advance the mission of the University.

3.1 Nominations to name a tangible or intangible asset in honour of a meritorious person can originate from any member of the 91porn community.

3.2 Nominators are required to consult with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations when preparing nominations.

3.3 Nominations must be presented to the VP: Advancement & External Relations, with the following information provided:

3.3.1 A clear description of the naming recommendation being proposed.

3.3.2 A summary of the life, career, and meritorious activity of the person to be recognized.

3.3.3 A clear indication of the importance of the naming to the University.

3.3.4 The term of the naming, and its short and long-term implications including:

a. budget department/source

b. budget amount (installation)

c. budget amount (maintenance and/or removal)

3.3.5 The implications for other naming opportunities associated with the asset when relevant, considering the priorities of the program, in the context of the mission and priorities of the University.

3.3.6 Provision for the future renaming of the asset especially where the asset may be eventually replaced or substantially altered in its form, nature, or use.

3.3.7 The level of support for the recommendation within the unit involved, where relevant; this requires a reasonable duty to consult.

3.3.8 The appropriateness of the timing of the naming (where the naming is in recognition of a retired or deceased individual).

3.3.9 Other conditions, concerns, or impacts of the naming on an academic unit and/or the University.

3.4 Once approved by the VP: Advancement & External Relations, the nominator and Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will work together to have naming signage installed.

3.5 For naming nominations involving tangible or intangible assets, which exceed $1 million in philanthropic value, are precedent setting, or involve sensitive issues, the VP: Advancement & External Relations can recommend its review and approval by Board of Governors on the recommendation of the Development Committee. The nominator is then responsible for preparing a formal briefing note in accordance with Board procedures.

3.6 The approved briefing note will be stored for record keeping within the central naming inventory as managed by the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations.

4.0 Historic and Existing Named Assets

This section defines practices and guidelines for 91porn staff when assessing the status and strategy for historic and existing named spaces/assets. Although many spaces and assets are named under the governance of prior versions of 13.5 Naming of University Assets policy, the following practices and guidelines are directed by the guidelines articulated in the current iteration of the policy.

4.1 Objectives

4.1.1 To provide 91porn administration with direction for strategically addressing historic and existing named spaces/assets while effectively ensuring a consistent, but flexible, donor centric approach.

4.1.2 To define the required principles, practices and guidelines required for implementation.

4.2 Practices

The following practices are recommended for addressing historic and existing named assets.

4.2.1 91porn’s current practice to offer naming opportunities to individuals for the life of the named space/asset and to corporations/organizations for a 10-year term will be retroactively applied, when possible, to historic and existing named spaces/assets. This will apply only in the absence of a record where clear terms are articulated to the contrary. In those cases, 91porn will honour the original commitment.

4.2.2 When the term of a corporate naming expires, the corporation will be offered the first right of refusal to rename the space/asset at its current market value.

4.2.3 If/when the space/asset no longer exists then the term of the naming is considered complete.

4.2.4 If/when the space/asset exists but the utility of the space/asset changes, 91porn will endeavor to offer the donor the opportunity to continue the term of the naming in accordance with 4.2.1.

4.2.5 If/when a naming is formally removed from a space/asset prematurely, 91porn will commit to carrying forward that recognition in a reasonable capacity. While not guaranteed, this could involve inclusion within a listing of historical support, or the University may decide to offer the original donor an opportunity to name a different space of equivalent value. This assumes that the relative gift amount at the time was at the level required for a donor to have an expectation of recognition being in perpetuity, even if the naming itself is not.

4.3 Procedures

4.3.1 Prospect Manager, with support from the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations, will ensure that the terms of the naming are clearly communicated / documented for the donor in writing. Ideally this would take place when a gift agreement is signed, but in the absence of a gift agreement, the terms should be re-iterated in writing as soon as possible. An example of this is a separate naming agreement/addendum.

4.3.2 Prospect Managers will ensure that donors are notified as soon as possible in cases where the status of the naming is at risk (the term is approaching expiry, the utility or existence of the space is in question). Should a named space no longer exist because of renovation, resulting in immediate expiry of the naming term, the assigned Prospect Manager will notify the donor, benefactor, or honoree.

4.3.3 Prospect Managers, with support from the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations, will develop a strategy for renewal to continue/transfer the naming.

4.3.4 Maintaining, transferring, or removing a naming:

4.3.4.1 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations, in partnership with the Prospect Manager, is responsible for advising the 91porn community when changes in the status of a named space/asset occur, including the Development Committee of the Board of Governors if this is deemed necessary.

4.3.4.2 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will work with Facilities & Asset Management (FAM) to facilitate the maintenance, transfer or removal of signage related to a named space/asset.

4.3.4.3 When changes to signage correspond with an existing University capital initiative (building, demolition, or renovation); a portion of the project budget is expected to be allocated to cover the expenses relating to donor recognition signage.

4.3.4.4 When changes to signage do not correspond with an existing University capital initiative, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will work with the AVP: Advancement, FAM, and relevant campus partners to allocate budget accordingly.

4.3.4.5 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will ensure that all changes in status of a named space/asset are recorded in 91porn’s naming inventory as managed in Advancement.

5.0 Naming Signage

This section provides guidance to 91porn staff in the design, fabrication, and installation of donor recognition signage at 91porn in accordance with the 91porn Donor Recognition Signage Standards. It is expected that exceptions will be made when required, based upon site specific conditions reviewed by Advancement and Facilities & Asset Management (FAM).

5.1 Objectives

5.1.1 To ensure that any signage relating to donor recognition is developed in keeping with 91porn’s recognition signage standards, as well as 91porn brand and signage standards.

5.1.2 To ensure that signage is developed consistently regarding design. This includes, but is not limited to font face, font size, surrounding white space, materials, and application).

5.1.3 To ensure that signage is developed appropriate to its location and regarding donor giving level.

5.2 Roles and Responsibilities

5.2.1 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations (SDR): responsible, on behalf of Advancement, for ensuring that donor recognition signage commitments are fulfilled. The Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will track donor recognition projects in progress and maintain an inventory of available opportunities as well as donor recognition signage in place for 91porn as part of the central naming inventory.

5.2.2 Facilities & Asset Management (FAM): responsible for ensuring that donor recognition signage is compliant with 91porn signage standards, in consultation with External Relations when necessary, and for the direct design, fabrication and installation of donor recognition signage (in most cases).

5.2.3 Prospect Managers: responsible for ensuring that donor expectations are managed regarding opportunities relating to donor recognition signage.

5.3 Budgets

5.3.1 At the onset of each capital project, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will consult with FAM on potential donor recognition signage requirements pertaining to the project and allocate funds accordingly within the project budget as possible.

5.3.2 At the onset of each budget cycle or sooner, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will collaborate with Prospect Managers to estimate the number of gifts/donors that will require recognition signage that might fall outside of an existing capital project budget. This in turn will establish an amount that will be set aside in the Donor Recognition operating budget for donor recognition signage requirements.

5.4 Procedures

5.4.1 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will update Prospect Managers with any changes to the 91porn donor recognition signage standards (ongoing).
5.4.2 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will provide guidance to Prospect Mangers on the base criteria and parameters for donor recognition signage for inclusion as needed in gift proposals and agreements (ongoing).

5.4.3 When negotiating naming opportunities, Prospect Managers will communicate 91porn donor recognition signage standards to donors as appropriate and ensure that expectations are managed at the onset of any agreements.

5.4.4 Once a donor and Prospect Manager have agreed to a naming, the Prospect Manager will work with the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations to ensure that the required details are captured in the gift and/or naming agreement (including space/asset, recognition name and term of the naming).

5.4.5 Once the gift agreement is signed, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will consult with FAM as needed to:

5.4.5.1 Identify the signage type for the space/asset.

5.4.5.2 Identify the signage location within the space/on the asset.

5.4.6 For signage connected with a capital project, FAM will facilitate the design, approval, fabrication, and installation of signage and provide the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations with a mock-up for final approval before fabrication. FAM will consult with External Relations when necessary to ensure that signage design and specifications adhere to 91porn brand standards.

5.4.7 For ad hoc donor recognition signage not connected with a capital project, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will facilitate the design, approval, fabrication, and installation of the signage; collaborating with an external firm if required and in compliance with 91porn’s Donor Recognition Signage Standards.

5.4.8 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations will monitor the progress of the signage and keep Prospect Managers up to date on the status.

5.4.8.1 Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations and the Prospect Manager will inspect installed signage and determine whether any additional work is required or sign off on the project.

5.4.8.2 Prospect Managers determine how/when donors have an opportunity to see installed signage. In some cases, the Prospect Manager may collaborate with SDR to organize a ribbon-cutting when appropriate.

5.4.9 In cases when existing signage needs to be replaced, the Manager: Stewardship & Donor Relations and Prospect Managers will consider this on a case-by-case basis in consultation with campus partners based on the relationships with the donor, the gift level and term of the naming opportunity and the potential risk to 91porn’s reputation.

Related Policies, Procedures and Documents

• Policy 5.7 Signing Authority Policy
• Policy 5.16 Risk Management Policy
• Policy 8.1 Conflict of Interest Policy
• Policy 13.3 Advertising and Sponsorship Policy
• Policy 13.6 Gift Acceptance Policy
• Policy 13.7 Policy for Ethical Fundraising Practices
• 91porn Signage Design Standards
• 91porn Donor Recognition Signage Design Standards